CSIS: Beijing Targets Canadian Political Aides for Deceptive Control

Beijing ​is reportedly targeting Canadian political aides in an⁤ attempt to covertly influence their superiors by ​controlling event ‌schedules, shaping talking‍ points, and managing requests from community groups. Newly⁢ released documents reveal that these staffers ⁢hold significant power as⁢ “gatekeepers” ⁣for⁢ their ‍employers, allowing them⁤ to ⁣clandestinely control and influence the activities of elected and appointed officials in ⁤ways⁢ that align with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) interests.

The potential for staffers to sway officials​ manifests in various ways. They ⁤can prevent certain community groups’ requests ⁣from being ‍seen, ⁢frame talking points to align with Beijing’s ​narratives, or organize ​public events at locations favorable to Chinese‍ interests. For example, they may ⁢choose venues owned by ⁣a‍ Chinese proxy or culturally significant⁢ sites like city halls ​or ⁤legislative buildings.

It is important to note that⁤ political aides do not necessarily‍ need to openly⁣ support China in order to become targets. The CCP also seeks to co-opt those who do not openly oppose⁣ or ‍speak out against China or‌ the Party. These aides are then persuaded to adopt⁢ positions ⁢friendly ​towards Beijing and speak out against⁤ actions ⁣perceived as⁣ “anti-China,” such as raising human rights concerns or visiting Taiwan officially.

According to ‍a briefing from Canada’s intelligence agency CSIS on March 25th,⁣ local community networks play ‌a crucial⁣ role in facilitating foreign interference activities. Chinese officials often conduct these activities ‍through local‍ networks tied ‌but not⁤ directly controlled by PRC officials.

The foreign influence networks ‍led ⁤by ‌Beijing include staff of targeted candidates and elected officials, ⁢Chinese officials residing in Canada, leaders⁣ of local⁣ Chinese-Canadian community groups, as well as Canadian⁣ political candidates and officials themselves. This⁤ network⁢ structure allows for an adaptable ‍approach that extends and enables covert PRC influence‌ at all levels of government.

Prior to the 2019⁣ election, intelligence reports indicated that 11 federal⁣ candidates and at least 13 aides were ⁢either implicated in‍ or impacted by​ China-linked threat actors operating within Canada. Some individuals appeared willing to‌ cooperate with foreign interference-related activity ⁤while others seemed unaware due its secretive nature.

In one example cited ‍in the summary⁣ report, PRC officials met with political⁢ staffers and explicitly ⁣conveyed their expectation for these staffers’ ‍involvement‍ in ​screening their candidate’s attendance at‍ certain events hosted by Taiwanese officials. Political​ staffers are considered important points of contact because ‌they play a role⁢ in the ⁢information flow process towards elected⁢ officials while also influencing which events a⁣ candidate attends.

Share:

Leave the first comment

Related News